Courts prioritize fairness and copyright fundamental rights though respecting the autonomy of educational institutions. About the aforesaid proposition, we have been guided from the decision in the Supreme Court in the case of Khyber Medical University and others v. Aimal Khan and others, PLD 2022 Supreme Court ninety two. nine. The aforesaid exceptions are missing inside the present case. In this sort of circumstances, this petition is found for being not maintainable which is dismissed accordingly with pending application (s). Read more

کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟

This Court might interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer in the method inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the manner of inquiry or where the summary or finding reached because of the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. In case the summary or finding is like no reasonable person would have ever achieved, the Court may interfere with the summary or maybe the finding and mildew the relief to really make it proper to your facts of each case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority will be the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-enjoy the evidence or even the nature of punishment. About the aforesaid proposition, we have been fortified via the decision of your Supreme Court in the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Source: Order: Downloads 252 Order Date: 24-JAN-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp

12. There isn't any denial from the fact that in Government service it is anticipated that the persons obtaining their character higher than board, free from any moral stigma, are to become inducted. Verification of character and antecedents can be a condition precedent for appointment to a Government service. The candidates must have good character and provide two recent character certificates from unrelated individuals. What is discernible from the above mentioned is that the only impediment to being appointed to some Government service may be the conviction on an offense involving moral turpitude but involvement, which does not culminate into a proof by conviction, cannot be a means out or guise to do absent with the candidature in the petitioner. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Source: Order: Downloads 133 Order Date: fifteen-JAN-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp

The Pakistan Penal Code (PPC) is a comprehensive piece of legislation that defines numerous criminal offenses and prescribes corresponding punishments for those found guilty.

The different roles of case legislation in civil and common law traditions create differences in just how that courts render decisions. Common law courts generally explain in detail the legal rationale at the rear of their decisions, with citations of both legislation and previous relevant judgments, and often interpret the broader legal principles.

ninety six . Const. P. 4965/2023 (D.B.) Saleem Khan V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It is actually nicely-settled that whilst thinking about the case of regular promotion of civil servants, the competent authority should consider the advantage of all of the suitable candidates and after because of deliberations, to grant promotion to these types of eligible candidates who're found to generally be most meritorious among them. Because the petitioner was held to be senior to his colleagues who were promoted in BS-19, the petitioner was disregarded with the case law sindh high court respondent department just to increase favor for the blue-eyed candidate based on OPS, which is apathy within the part of your respondent department.

six.  Mere involvement inside a heinous offence is not any ground for refusing bail to an accused who otherwise becomes entitled with the concession of bail. The petitioner namely Bhoora was arrested in this case on 08.05.2018, given that then He's guiding the bars, he is previous non-convict, never involved in almost any case, investigation qua him is complete, his person isn't any more required for further investigation, therefore, his ongoing incarceration would not serve any valuable purpose at this stage.

P.C. Liability of petitioners to the explained offences would be determined with the figured out trial Court after sifting the evidentiary really worth on the material generated before the same. Till then, case of

From the United States, courts exist on both the federal and state levels. The United States Supreme Court is the highest court during the United States. Decreased courts over the federal level incorporate the U.S. Courts of Appeals, U.S. District Courts, the U.S. Court of Claims, and also the U.S. Court of International Trade and U.S. Bankruptcy Courts. Federal courts listen to cases involving matters related to your United States Constitution, other federal laws and regulations, and certain matters that require parties from different states or countries and large sums of money in dispute. Each and every state has its individual judicial system that contains trial and appellate courts. The highest court in Every state is frequently referred to since the “supreme” court, Even though there are a few exceptions to this rule, for example, the The big apple Court of Appeals or even the Maryland Court of Appeals. State courts generally hear cases involving state constitutional matters, state regulation and regulations, While state courts may generally hear cases involving federal laws.

                                                                  

one. Judicial Independence: The court emphasised the importance of judicial independence and also the separation of powers.

In order to preserve a uniform enforcement of the laws, the legal system adheres into the doctrine of stare decisis

P.C. for grant of post arrest bail should also be dismissed. Suffice is to look at that that considerations for pre- arrest and post-arrest bail are fully different. Reliance in this regard is placed on case regulation titled as “Shah Nawaz v. The State” 2005 SCMR 1899” wherein it has been held with the august Supreme Court of Pakistan as under:--